Skip to content

Study guides

How to study effectively, according to the research

In the 2013 review by Dunlosky and colleagues, only two of ten study techniques earned a high utility rating, practice testing and spreading your study sessions out over time (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Rereading, highlighting and summarizing were rated low.

By the Lumi team · Published 5 November 2026

The ten techniques compared

In 2013, Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan and Willingham reviewed ten widely used study techniques and rated how useful each one is, based on the evidence available (Dunlosky et al., 2013). The result often surprises students, because the most popular methods are also the lowest rated. A survey of 177 students found that most of them reread their notes or textbook, and relatively few quiz themselves (Karpicke et al., 2009).

The table below lists the ten techniques and the rating of each. Two stand out clearly, practice testing and distributed practice. Three sit in the middle. Five are rated low, including rereading and highlighting. These ratings tell you which technique held up best under scrutiny. They give you an order of priority when time is short.

Quiz yourself instead of rereading

In the study by Roediger and Karpicke, students read a text once and then quizzed themselves three times. One week later they remembered 61% of the ideas, against 40% for students who had reread the text four times (Roediger and Karpicke, 2006). This technique is called active recall, and you will find the details in Active recall, why quizzing yourself beats rereading.

In practice, you close your notes, try to answer a question, rewrite a definition or redraw a diagram from memory, and then check. The effort of retrieving is what counts. A 2014 meta-analysis also found that recall tests give a bigger benefit than recognition tests, such as multiple choice (Rowland, 2014). Before finals, that means answering practice questions from your course with the book closed instead of reading the chapter a fourth time.

Spread it out instead of cramming

The meta-analysis by Cepeda and colleagues, 839 measures drawn from 317 experiments, concluded that spacing beats massing (Cepeda et al., 2006). In another study with more than 1,350 people, the ideal gap between two sessions was about 20 to 40% of the delay before the test when the test was a week away (Cepeda et al., 2008). For an exam in 10 days, that means a second session 2 to 4 days after the first.

With vocabulary flashcards, spacing worked better for 90% of participants, yet 72% thought after the first session that massing worked better (Kornell, 2009). So the feeling misleads you. Rawson and Dunlosky advise recalling an item correctly 3 times in the first session, then relearning it 3 times at widely spaced intervals (Rawson and Dunlosky, 2011). You will find the details in Spaced repetition, how long to wait between two reviews and, for the night before an exam, in Does cramming the night before an exam work?.

The middle of the table

Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation and interleaved practice get a moderate utility rating (Dunlosky et al., 2013). That is not a bad score, and these techniques make a good complement once you already quiz yourself. Interleaving means mixing problem types instead of grouping them. In math, it improved results on a delayed test (Rohrer and Taylor, 2007). In practice, that means mixing the kinds of problems in one homework set instead of doing ten of the same type in a row. See Does interleaving, or mixed practice, really help you study?.

Another result points the same way, although it is not one of the ten techniques. Participants who studied a text expecting to teach it produced fuller, better organized recall, even though nobody actually taught (Nestojko et al., 2014). This is the idea behind Does learning by teaching work? What research says about the protégé effect. So you can explain your course out loud, as if someone had to understand it after you.

The low-rated techniques

Summarizing, highlighting or underlining, keyword mnemonics, mental imagery for text and rereading all get a low utility rating (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Low does not mean useless. It means other methods held up better against the evidence. The trap is that these methods give you a feeling of mastery. In the study by Roediger and Karpicke, the students who reread were the most confident they would remember, yet they had forgotten the most one week later (Roediger and Karpicke, 2006).

If you like highlighting or rereading, keep them as a first step, then move quickly to quizzing yourself. The dedicated pages cover each case, Why rereading your notes is not enough and Is highlighting your notes actually useful?. A good habit for finals or AP prep is to turn each highlighted passage into a question, then ask it to yourself the next day without looking.

The ten techniques in the 2013 review and their utility rating
TechniqueUtility according to Dunlosky et al. (2013)
Practice testingHigh
Distributed practiceHigh
Elaborative interrogationModerate
Self-explanationModerate
Interleaved practiceModerate
SummarizationLow
Highlighting or underliningLow
Keyword mnemonicsLow
Imagery for textLow
RereadingLow

Sources · Dunlosky et al., 2013

Frequently asked questions

What is the best way to study?
In the review by Dunlosky and colleagues, the two top-rated techniques are practice testing and spreading your study out over time (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Combining them gives the most solid base, and you add the rest depending on your subject.
How many hours a day should I study?
The studies cited here compare methods, they do not set an ideal number of hours per day. What they measure is the gap between sessions, for example reviewing 2 to 4 days after the first session for an exam in 10 days (Cepeda et al., 2008).
Do study cards work or are they a waste of time?
Summarizing is rated low, but a card works well if you use it to quiz yourself, so cover the answer and recall it before checking. With flashcards, spacing beat cramming the day before (Kornell, 2009). See How to make flashcards that actually work.

In Lumi, you teach your notes to Lumi, as text, a photo, a PDF or dictation. He builds his own questions from them and quizzes you again at the right time, with fill in the blank questions and multiple choice. He sometimes gets things wrong on purpose, and it is up to you to correct him. That is how Lumi applies active recall and spaced repetition, the two top-rated techniques.

Sources

  1. Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, Willingham (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1). doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
  2. Roediger, Karpicke (2006). Test-enhanced learning. Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3). doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
  3. Cepeda, Vul, Rohrer, Wixted, Pashler (2008). Spacing effects in learning. A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19(11). doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x
  4. Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, Rohrer (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks. A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3). doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
  5. Kornell (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards. Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9). doi.org/10.1002/acp.1537
  6. Rawson, Dunlosky (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning. How much is enough?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 140(3). doi.org/10.1037/a0023956
  7. Karpicke, Butler, Roediger (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning. Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?. Memory, 17(4). doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
  8. Rowland (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention. A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6). doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
  9. Rohrer, Taylor (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35(6). doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8
  10. Nestojko, Bui, Kornell, Bjork (2014). Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages. Memory and Cognition, 42(7). doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0416-z

Teach this to Lumi

Lumi quizzes you at the right moment, and you’re the one who remembers.

Coming soon on theApp StoreFree with 3 cards a week. No ads.